Joined

·
344 Posts

1 - 18 of 18 Posts

Joined

·
344 Posts

Joined

·
3,057 Posts

No weights but they all come in at the spey standards for weights at 80'.For the:

7 weight, I have the max diameter at 65 feet, the total head length

at 80 feet, and the total line length at 127 feet.

8 weight, max diameter at 75 feet, head length 90 feet, total line

length of 126 feet

9 weight, max dia. at 82.5 feet, head length at 92.5 feet, total line

length of 127.5 feet

10 weight, max dia. at 90 feet, head length 102.5 feet, line length

140 feet.

Hope that helps,

-sean

Joined

·
7,105 Posts

You can find the "new" XLT weights here:

http://www.redshedflyshop.com/XLTSPECS.html

http://www.redshedflyshop.com/XLTSPECS.html

Joined

·
344 Posts

MJC said:You can find the "new" XLT weights here:

http://www.redshedflyshop.com/XLTSPECS.html

There are some gaps in the 8wt information

Joined

·
7,105 Posts

There are no gaps in the info. The end of the head is at 75' where it starts tapering to the running line at 95'. The head is weighed at 80' and the target weight is 711grns. This info is exactly as furnished by SA.

Joined

·
344 Posts

Over all these lines are awesome. I can't believe how easy they are to cast.

Joined

·
3,649 Posts

Being a retired engineer myself, I sympathize with you. Mike the line at five foot entervals. I use Dia sq. x 2160 to determine length per foot for a floating line.

When The XLT lines first came out, they published the weight as well as the length of the entiire head. Now, to conform with the new standards, it seems they only tell you about the first 80 feet. Kind of like the single hand lines. The first 30 feet must conform to the weight standard. But you can do whatever you want with the remaining line and still call it a X wt,,,,based on the weight of the first 30 feet.

Joined

·
3,267 Posts

Using that formula, I can see how one might calculate a length per foot different from 12"JDJones said:I use Dia sq. x 2160 to determine length per foot for a floating line.

seriously, what is the formula, and what is it calculating? I'm no engineer, just a line geek

Joined

·
3,649 Posts

Wish I knew how to make a keyboard type math.SSPey said:Using that formula, I can see how one might calculate a length per foot different from 12"

seriously, what is the formula, and what is it calculating? I'm no engineer, just a line geek

Diameter multiplied by itself, or diameter times diameter, or diameter squared. However you want to say it. .078x.078 all the same. multiply that by 2160. The answer equals the weight in grains for one foot of line of that diameter. Kapish??? .078x.078x2160=13.14 grains per foot.

Really all you are doing is calulating the weight based on volume and density. Volume being expressed in cubic inches of one foot of line. Density being the specific gravity of the pvc coating, with a little fudge factor thrown in for the core material. So area (dia sq. x .7854) x length (12 inches) x 229 (grains per cubic inch) All of these numbers will remain the same except the diameter. Therefore, .7854 x 12 x 229=2160. That is constant,,,,,or,,,,the magic number. A formula could be derived for any length of line. I just used 1 foot.

It may not be exact. But it's close enough.

Joined

·
2,829 Posts

Where did you get the 229 grains/cubic inch? There are different cores being used in the fly lines and different coatings. For the coatings, AirFlo is not PVC. Carron uses a very different core that is very flexible. I do not know if it has the same density as that used by most American manufacturers.

Joined

·
7,105 Posts

Wouldn't it be easier just to get a grain scale and measure the head plus the rear taper.

Joined

·
465 Posts

The 229 grains per cubic-inch is the mystery though. It's certainly appears to be in the right range (S=0.9) as floating lines are just slightly buoyant enough to float (by the way, Specific gravity and density are not the same thing). The precision of this value for density is undoubtedly much greater than reality, especially if one came to it by throwing in fudge factors, but this really doesn't matter much -other than giving the impression that things are much more exacting than they actually are.

And as far as method presented, one should use the

Joined

·
344 Posts

It is also great that if d is the distance between diameter measurements then as d approaches zero, the accuracy goes way up!

Joined

·
3,649 Posts

A fellow engineer came up with that figure. Like I said, it aint perfect, but it's close. It doesn't work with airflow lines. If I knew how to write an equation on a computer, an easier way would be to figure (level) line weights based on proportions. Aaron, speybum, Has the diameters and weights per foot for level lines (the big stuff) posted on his website.

Joined

·
465 Posts

JD -I think he's hinting about the C-word, ya know, limits and integrals and that stuff.

Joined

·
1,048 Posts

All I want to know is , after reading the formula for rocket fuel to us everyday folks ---Do we need to read the MSDS sheet on XLT's before we can safely fish them ?:lildevl: Should they be regulated by the EPA? Also if more than 10 of those lines end up on the same stretch of river at the same time- would that be considered a hazardous area?:chuckle:

only if cast by anglers with my skills- or lack there of.danimal said:Also if more than 10 of those lines end up on the same stretch of river at the same time- would that be considered a hazardous area?:chuckle:

1 - 18 of 18 Posts

- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.

Spey Pages

A forum community dedicated to Spey casting, fishing, flies, and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about trails, licenses, fishing, game laws, styles, reviews, optics, accessories, classifieds, and more!

Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums

Recommended Communities

Join now to ask and comment!