Joined
·
1,273 Posts
OK, finally back and settled down from Clavin'/fishin' in Oregon. What a great time, great people, great gathering of Spey talent and camraderie! Fishing was good too! Always awesome to feel the first grab inaugurating summer-run steelheading, and a super thrill to bring the first bit of summer chrome to hand. They shine like dynamite wrapped in thousands of tiny polished mirrors! Taste good too (hatcheries, of course).
For those attending - questions - in the hope of improving my presentation in the future.
I've already been made aware of the fact that I was talking too fast - a byproduct of nervousness on my part, and I appreciate the input. It's not easy standing in front of a bunch of people staring at you! Yikes! I get jittery just thinking about it. Perhaps in 20 more years I will become as smooth and suave as George. What I am wondering is if the high energy output of Skagit casting is evident in the demonstrations. I am getting the feeling that though I point out the fact that the rod I am using is smaller and lighter than the norm for demonstrating, that this fact is not being correlated to the casting being displayed. Does my use of a light, soft rod to cast a weighted fly on a sinktip line clearly illustrate the capabilities of the casting method, or does the use of such an outfit "water down" the speed of the cast enough to make it indistinguishable from other casts? Would the use of a rod more in line with the other demonstrators (15' 9 or 10 weight, floating line) better illustrate comparison of line speed during a cast? Should I change the angle of my casts more downstream, rather than straight across the river? I would certainly appreciate comments, after all, you folks are the ones watching and seeing what is going on. From where I'm standing, I can't really tell the visual effect of what I am doing.
For those attending - questions - in the hope of improving my presentation in the future.
I've already been made aware of the fact that I was talking too fast - a byproduct of nervousness on my part, and I appreciate the input. It's not easy standing in front of a bunch of people staring at you! Yikes! I get jittery just thinking about it. Perhaps in 20 more years I will become as smooth and suave as George. What I am wondering is if the high energy output of Skagit casting is evident in the demonstrations. I am getting the feeling that though I point out the fact that the rod I am using is smaller and lighter than the norm for demonstrating, that this fact is not being correlated to the casting being displayed. Does my use of a light, soft rod to cast a weighted fly on a sinktip line clearly illustrate the capabilities of the casting method, or does the use of such an outfit "water down" the speed of the cast enough to make it indistinguishable from other casts? Would the use of a rod more in line with the other demonstrators (15' 9 or 10 weight, floating line) better illustrate comparison of line speed during a cast? Should I change the angle of my casts more downstream, rather than straight across the river? I would certainly appreciate comments, after all, you folks are the ones watching and seeing what is going on. From where I'm standing, I can't really tell the visual effect of what I am doing.