Well...
Dan...how much have you fished this rig. Not to shoot at your balloon, but 1) you've sort of (re)invented the density compensated tip. I don't think Rio or SA will steal your idea, though.
2) There are a couple of details missing from your explanation. First, going from lower to higher sink rates is okay, but what determines hinging is both mass and flex...
a) mono (any line for that matter) hinges if it is more flexible than the lines it's connecting. You should specify what size and brand of mono you're using with different tip weights.
b) You will have a hard time turning over higher mass tips at the end, as they will tend to collapse. My experience is that most company's shooting heads go up a little in weight as they go from F to I to 3 to (type) 6. A line turns over because the mass/length decreases along the taper as the energy decreases. The system will collapse unless you drop to smaller line weights or use very short tips. I haven't tried it, but you might be successful (for instance) using 9wt intermed., 8wt type 3, and 7wt type 6.
As another Michigan fisherman, and knowing the uneven current structures of most midwest streams/rivers, WHY is this setup better than a shorter tip of straight type 6? It seems to me that a longer head just puts you more at the mercy of drag.
Best wishes on your experiments. It's the tinkering that results in some good innovations. Keep it up!!
Dan...how much have you fished this rig. Not to shoot at your balloon, but 1) you've sort of (re)invented the density compensated tip. I don't think Rio or SA will steal your idea, though.
2) There are a couple of details missing from your explanation. First, going from lower to higher sink rates is okay, but what determines hinging is both mass and flex...
a) mono (any line for that matter) hinges if it is more flexible than the lines it's connecting. You should specify what size and brand of mono you're using with different tip weights.
b) You will have a hard time turning over higher mass tips at the end, as they will tend to collapse. My experience is that most company's shooting heads go up a little in weight as they go from F to I to 3 to (type) 6. A line turns over because the mass/length decreases along the taper as the energy decreases. The system will collapse unless you drop to smaller line weights or use very short tips. I haven't tried it, but you might be successful (for instance) using 9wt intermed., 8wt type 3, and 7wt type 6.
As another Michigan fisherman, and knowing the uneven current structures of most midwest streams/rivers, WHY is this setup better than a shorter tip of straight type 6? It seems to me that a longer head just puts you more at the mercy of drag.
Best wishes on your experiments. It's the tinkering that results in some good innovations. Keep it up!!