Sometimes Heavy is Too Heavy - Spey Pages
 38Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
post #1 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-26-2015, 01:40 PM Thread Starter
Hooked4life
 
peter-s-c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Grand River, Ontario
Posts: 2,081
Sometimes Heavy is Too Heavy

I keep running across this issue with clients who come to me for casting instruction - they were told to buy lines that are way too heavy for their rods, based on the idea that they are beginners. Fortunately, I bring the right lines for their rod to the casting session so that all is not lost.

The theory goes that heavy is better for beginners, but too heavy makes the rod touchier to cast and requires more effort, not less.

The manufacturer's recommendations already tend to be a bit on the heavy side based on the idea that many purchasers are not proficient Spey casters. To add weight on top of that is unnecessary.

We constantly get requests for line recommendations on this forum and many replies suggest really heavy lines, when the recommendation should be to start with whatever the rod designer has suggested.

I've described the issue in more depth here: Sometimes Heavy is Too Heavy | Opinion | Hooked4life Fly Fishing

Peter Charles
F.F.F. C.C.I.
Field Staff G. Loomis / Shimano
Pro Staff Airflo, Simms, The Canadian Tube Fly Company

http://www.hooked4life.ca
peter-s-c is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-26-2015, 02:36 PM
Registered User
 
fish0n4evr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The mid-Pacific.
Posts: 4,784
Up by one weight-class with the entire body beyond the tip until comfy then back off is how it was first put to me. And it worked well enough that I often use 7/8 on an 6/7 rod, sometimes 5/6 depending. Most rods can handle two, maybe three weight classes. Beyond that - i can imagine it would be big hinderance more than anything...
fish0n4evr is offline  
post #3 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-26-2015, 02:45 PM
Dom
 
domantas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: WI, MI, IN
Posts: 2,999
IMO going hevier for starters is a bad bad idea! Shorter, yes!
fredaevans likes this.

Flyfishing, Jeeps, tattoos, love, rock & roll and other religious matter.
domantas is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-26-2015, 03:32 PM
Registered User
 
fish0n4evr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The mid-Pacific.
Posts: 4,784
Yeah - I agree. Going shorter will be easiest for most folks starting out: Skagit short for that matter. But once the taper has been determined, what the angler wants to cast, it helps to load-up on grains in order to help feel the load and the timing of the cast. Loading up helps by allowing the caster to slow down during the cast while learning. As stated most line and rod manufacturers have their recommendations - usually mid range for experienced casters and slightly heavy for the beginner. Slightly heavy both within the range of lines ( i.e. 7/8 for a 6/7) and slightly heavy within the window for the rod in grains.
fish0n4evr is offline  
post #5 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-26-2015, 05:30 PM Thread Starter
Hooked4life
 
peter-s-c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Grand River, Ontario
Posts: 2,081
When teaching a newcomer to Spey casting, I'm always using standard length heads (Skagit, Scandi or short head Spey) and the correct line for the rated weight of the rod. Loomis recommends for a PRO-4X 13' 7/8 either a 460 Scandi and 520 Skagit, or a 7/8 short head. So I put on Airflo equivalents, either a 450 or a 510 respectively, or the 7/8 Delta II if they want to go Short Head Spey (rare). Clients have no trouble with feeling the rod load or getting decent casts off, once a couple of simple techniques are mastered.
Whiskey Dick and MT Box like this.

Peter Charles
F.F.F. C.C.I.
Field Staff G. Loomis / Shimano
Pro Staff Airflo, Simms, The Canadian Tube Fly Company

http://www.hooked4life.ca
peter-s-c is offline  
post #6 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-26-2015, 07:42 PM
Undertaker
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: clackamas
Posts: 1,177
Totally not a spey comment, but when fishing a short line (such small stream fishing for trout) I honestly prefer a level line, particularly when nymphing. They simply load the rod better at short distances - and yes, I generally throw a 6 wt level line on my 5 wt trout rod.
steelhead23 is offline  
post #7 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-26-2015, 09:17 PM
Registered User
 
fish0n4evr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The mid-Pacific.
Posts: 4,784
65 feet is about where I hit my limit for a 13 footer - That's a GPS 7/8 600 grains on a 6/7 MKS. That rod will go to 650 grains and so an 8/9 Short belly wouldn't be too heavy.
fish0n4evr is offline  
post #8 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-26-2015, 09:17 PM
I only have 2 hands
 
MT Box's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Greater Yellowstone Region
Posts: 176
When it comes to the world renown top end name brands or custom rod makers I can imagine recommendations are spot on most the time. But the cheap rods(the ones most beginners end up with) always seem to be rated a weight or two off........Most the time they need to be over weighted. Sometimes throwing a line wt. lighter makes them work better....one can never tell. Here comes the rant!!! A person in China that spins these things but doesn't know what it's for is not going to do the job an angler working at a high end factory or shop will do. I wish I could afford the top end stuff but unfortunately I just work in my country but can barely afford to live here. I am forced to shop somewhere else. Some would try to say I am at fault for the economy suffering because I can't afford to buy stuff not from China or Korea. Read that previous sentence very closely and help me understand this This thread is a great advertisement for the rod and line companies mentioned though.. Thanks for reading my rant.

still wading too deep

Last edited by MT Box; 08-27-2015 at 12:03 AM.
MT Box is offline  
post #9 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-26-2015, 11:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rogue River
Posts: 11,027
SOOO YES Pete;'Newbie' just purchased a rod, etc ..

Well, the fly shop wanted to get the darned thing out of inventory. You could 'horse' Namu the Whale with the thing. "You will fear no fish with this ...."

"I feel your pain!"

fae




Fred Evans - White City, Oregon
fredaevans is offline  
post #10 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-27-2015, 12:45 AM
Scandit sublima virtus
 
SpeySpaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cowlamasqually
Posts: 2,215
I almost always start a beginner on a 12'6" 5/6 or 7/8 with a scandi head and SA casts, but very quickly introduce T&G once they get a decent forward stroke. If you don't know it's hard, there's no barriers.

I think overlining rods is a mistake. I want newbs to feel what a balanced outfit is like, and the ineffable sweet feeling of their first good casts tends to stick in their brain, establishing a good benchmark for the future.
Whiskey Dick and morrison205 like this.

Captain of the Jameson Godawful casting team
Member-Mullockers Anonymous
Sportkilt Sponsored Middle Aged "athlete"
SpeySpaz is offline  
post #11 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-27-2015, 12:52 AM
registered text offender
 
matuka mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orewashingontanaho
Posts: 1,304
how bout the same question for touch and go casts ? I assume the light scandi recommendations are best for tng casts, but in most cases seem heavier than I like. is that what others are finding also ?

insta-release not Insta-gram !!

Dog is my co-pilot !
matuka mike is offline  
post #12 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-27-2015, 07:15 AM Thread Starter
Hooked4life
 
peter-s-c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Grand River, Ontario
Posts: 2,081
[QUOTE=SpeySpaz;1437938
I think overlining rods is a mistake. I want newbs to feel what a balanced outfit is like, and the ineffable sweet feeling of their first good casts tends to stick in their brain, establishing a good benchmark for the future.[/QUOTE]

Exactly! Once they have felt what a loaded rod feels like and see the line fly out there, they are hooked. They also inevitably comment that they now know what good feels like and can now practice having a standard to judge their progress.
Whiskey Dick and SpeySpaz like this.

Peter Charles
F.F.F. C.C.I.
Field Staff G. Loomis / Shimano
Pro Staff Airflo, Simms, The Canadian Tube Fly Company

http://www.hooked4life.ca
peter-s-c is offline  
post #13 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-27-2015, 07:22 AM Thread Starter
Hooked4life
 
peter-s-c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Grand River, Ontario
Posts: 2,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by matuka mike View Post
how bout the same question for touch and go casts ? I assume the light scandi recommendations are best for tng casts, but in most cases seem heavier than I like. is that what others are finding also ?
I usually don't teach Snakes and Singles to beginners unless they specifically request them. I usually teach the Circle and the Double with or without sustained anchor depending on the line in use.

Most of the manufacturer's Scandi weight recommendations I see out there are well within the rod's happy range, but toward the heavier end. An experienced Underhand caster will probably want to go lighter. Since beginners can't always develop that Underhand stroke, their more open casting stroke benefits from a slightly heavier head.

Peter Charles
F.F.F. C.C.I.
Field Staff G. Loomis / Shimano
Pro Staff Airflo, Simms, The Canadian Tube Fly Company

http://www.hooked4life.ca
peter-s-c is offline  
post #14 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-27-2015, 08:37 AM
Scandit sublima virtus
 
SpeySpaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cowlamasqually
Posts: 2,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by matuka mike View Post
how bout the same question for touch and go casts ? I assume the light scandi recommendations are best for tng casts, but in most cases seem heavier than I like. is that what others are finding also ?
It's hard to tune a scandi outfit for a beginner to learn on, because they haven't found their cast yet. But that's splitting hairs, right? So long as the scandi head is in the lower end of the rod's range and they can begin building skills, it's OK by me. If I can make a clean and relaxed Underhand cast with it, I feel like it'll be OK for them.

But I will bring along a ziploc bag with a variety of heads for a newer guy to try. Usually, they don't get wet.

I've moved guys up to 50' short spey heads in two sessions, and one guy was actually casting my 16' rod with a midbelly in his third session. This can go quick if they focus down on fundamentals, have fun, and have supportive coaching that meets their own learning style. Others struggle and that's OK too. I tell them to "love the suck, embrace the suck, we've all been there".
MT Box likes this.

Captain of the Jameson Godawful casting team
Member-Mullockers Anonymous
Sportkilt Sponsored Middle Aged "athlete"
SpeySpaz is offline  
post #15 of 31 (permalink) Old 08-27-2015, 10:09 AM
Registered User
 
fish0n4evr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The mid-Pacific.
Posts: 4,784
This is out of topic but while we're speaking of beginners getting into one style of head -vs- another I don't agree that a scandi head should be light, that a skagit heads should be heavier than that, or that a speyline ought to be of a different weight altogether. Im not sure just how many are beginners, but majority of anglers are being taught the three different standard and majority abide by going even heavier as the length increases.

For those who instruct - you are successful in that you have your folks casting fairly easily. But lets just say one of your dudes continues to struggle ...
I don't instruct so I wonder: Do you allow them to continue struggling because you believe it is incorrect to go heavier even though it will help? Would you go heavier? I have taught a grand total of 3 complete strangers to angling and 1 former conventional gear angler. If I where to get into instructing I would put everyone on short-bellys, tapered leaders, I wouldn't even mention skagit or sink tips and I would be successful at it. I feel it's the right way to learn to speycast.

I also believe in what feels right to me and as it turns out "right to me" is mid-low to mid range if I were to look at the prescribed grains window for each of my rods. When I first got into skagit heads and then into scandi heads they where of the same weight for one rod. I'm back on the extended-bellies and keep a heavy compact head around just in case. For just this one rod (a 6/7) my preferred mid belly is actually lighter than the skagit head. The other line is a 7/8. I don't say anything - simply slip the lines in and out of there and the rod doesn't seem to know the difference.

Last edited by fish0n4evr; 08-27-2015 at 12:14 PM.
fish0n4evr is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Spey Pages forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Rate This Thread:



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Heavy Reels Leo M Tackle 20 08-18-2015 04:34 PM
heavy hooks? domantas Hooks, Feathers and Floss 14 01-28-2015 06:00 PM
Heavy flies gcarlson Tackle 3 10-22-2009 10:24 PM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome